The Right to Privacy Judgment

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs Union of India judgment, popularly known as the Right to Privacy judgment is undoubtedly one of the landmark judgment of present times. The 9 judge bench unanimously held the Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right implied under Article 21 of the Indian constitution. In this Article, I will open up my apprehensions on this particular judgment.

One would agree that in a given circumstances we take a call about future based on at least a faint idea of what is going to happen. However, in this judgment, it seems to me that the judges have taken the call based on their fear about future rather than a clarity of way forward. I do support the Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right but the high degree of uncertainty around its implementation which is the result of lack of clarity is what pinches me the most. If we see previous interpretations of Article 21 such as Right to clean environment or Right to go abroad, one can say that these interpretation do not face too much of an explanation to be understood. The Right to Privacy is also too wide a right to be incorporated in Article 21 as it itself is capable of giving rise to a number of rights as hinted in the judgment itself.

My second apprehension about its derivation from Article 21. It is here where I wish that the constitution had the Right to Property and privacy was protected by creating several aspects of identity as individual property. The Parliament repealed the Right to Property without much of an explanation. Even Economic Survey pointed out this ambivalent attitude of the State towards property as an area which needs reform. On one hand we embrace the capitalist form of development and on the other hand, there is no Fundamental Right to Property. If today such a right was present, the Supreme Court or the Legislature might have utilized it to bring the Right to Privacy under the ambit of Fundamental Rights.

The Supreme Court has asked the Centre to frame provision detailing the Right to Privacy. Right to Privacy is essential, but its impact would be properly assessed only after we have a detailed provision and working of the Right to Privacy in hand.


My Favourite appliance

In class XI, we were taught thermodynamics and I came across Carnot engine. Sadi Carnot devised this engine in 1824 which is several years before the laws of thermodynamics were formally laid down. Theoretically Carnot engine can achieve efficiency of 1 which is highest possible efficiency. My curiosity was touched and I made up my mind to build a Carnot engine. Although I didn’t made any success in this direction, my quest of finding an efficient heat engine started from this time. This is when my admiration for a pressure cooker reached new heights and it became my favourite appliance.

The pressure cooker is a heat engine. While it has been across my sight since childhood, I was able to appreciate its working when I became aware of the principle behind it after reading thermodynamics. The basic principle behind the working of a pressure cooker is the variable of pressure and temperature. Water that is used for cooking food, boils at 100 Degree Celsius at normal atmospheric pressure. However, in a cooker, the pressure is above atmospheric pressure due to which the boiling point of water increases. Thus water boils at a higher temperature and more energy is transferred to the food being cooked. I found a very simple explanation of the working on YouTube in the following video by Seema Rodge.


What amazes me is the simplicity of principle behind this appliance which causes huge saving of energy at the individual as well as global scale. When the world is reeling under the wrath of climate change, we should pause and appreciate the usefulness of simple appliances such as pressure cooker in decreasing en energy consumption. Although Carnot engine remains a theoretical model, research should strive to achieve higher efficiency in heat engines too. People can be made aware and we can push greater adoption of such appliances which saves energy such as pressure cooker.

Since the day I came to know about the usefulness of Pressure cooker, I have always talked about it with my friends and elders. So that’s my favourite appliance. Please tell me about your favourite appliance in the comments section. Cheers.



Key takeaways from Richard Thaler’s work

In 2017, Richard Thaler was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his contributions to behavioural economics. In its Nobel prize announcement, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said that his “contributions have built a bridge between the economic and psychological analyses of individual decision-making. His empirical findings and theoretical insights have been instrumental in creating the new and rapidly expanding field of behavioural economics.” In this article, I have chalked out my key takeaways from his work based on an article published in the NYTimes

  • His popular work deals on how nudging bring changes in people’s behaviour. For example, British government found that people were more likely to pay automobile registration fees if billing letters included a picture of the vehicle. I recall this campaign done by a group to increase voter turnout in US election, which can be said as nudging, in which voters of one locality was made aware of the turnout of their neighbourhood so that they feel a greater urge to vote. In India, Swachh Bharat Abhiyan is a mission which is trying to do so to bring behavioural changes in sanitation. The story of Ghatpatila in 24 Parangana is an example.
  • Thaler also talked about how people perform a budgeting exercise in their mind. According to him if gasoline price decreases, standard economic theory suggests that people will use savings for whatever they need most which is probably not additional gasoline. But in reality people still spend much money on gasoline and buy premium gasoline even if they know it is bad for their car. This example can be used in predicting probable usage of universal basic income once it becomes a reality.
  • Endowment effect- Thaler pointed out that people place a higher value on their possessions. In his experiment, he showed how a mug given randomly to few students regarded their mug twice as valuable as compared with the other students who were not given a mug. We can apply this phenomenon to understand why community-owned resources and initiatives such as pani panchayat in Odhisa are successful.
  • He also observed that people have this tendency to penalise unfair behaviour even if they do not benefit from doing so. For example, a umbrella store won’t raise prices during a rainstorm as he very well understands that people would risk getting drenched but won’t buy umbrellas at prices which seem unreasonable to them.

In short Richard Thaler works show that people do not behave rationally at all times. But the deviance from rationality is consistent and so their behaviour can still be anticipated and modelled. People are predictably irrational.

Richard Thaler work has inspired UK government to set up a separate office to bring this wisdom of behavioural economics such as nudging in making public policy. The US government has also followed the suit. In India, NITI Ayog is working on this. Richard Thaler works are bold steps away from traditional model and bring forward a more valid modelling of people’s economic behaviour.

Judicial Activism or Retreating Parliament

Judicial activism has been a much talked about topic in the newspaper this year. The Indian constitution has provided for a balance of power among the three arms of the government. Judicial activism is supposed to be disturbing this fine balance. In this article, I am discussing Judicial activism with reference to two major legislation passed in recent times.

The two major legislations are- The Aadhaar Act 2016 which is related to the delivery of subsidies by the government using Aadhar card and the GST Act which was a constitutional amendment aimed at subsuming several indirect taxes into one tax. Both these acts have the capability to affect the entire population of India. However, the Aadhaar Act has been under judicial scrutiny since its passage while that is not the case in the GST Law. One of the prime reason lies in the way these bills were passed in the Parliament. The government doesn’t have the required majority in Rajya Sabha and since the GST Bill was a constitutional amendment Bill, the Rajya Sabha exercised due deliberation power and the government was forced to bring some necessary changes. But in case of Aadhaar Bill, the government introduced it as a money bill, thereby bypassing the power of Rajya Sabha in bringing necessary debate and changes. The GST Bill had been in pipeline since a decade, hence a good amount of time was spent on deliberation while the Aadhaar Bill was not scrutinized with that merit as Rajya Sabha doesn’t have substantial power over a money bill. Hence, the crux of the issue is that while the GST Bill was subjected to proper deliberation and scrutiny by both the houses, the Aadhaar Bill bypassed such a deliberation in the Rajya Sabha.The result is in front of our eyes- the stage of deliberation has now moved from the constitutionally mandated stage of the Parliament to the Supreme Court.

The three arms of government are not disjoint but are complementary. Thus if one arm abdicates its duty, the other arm is bound to fill the space. The following would serve the best conclusion of this manuscript (source)

“The acute needs of the developing countries of the Commonwealth have sometimes produced an approach to constitutional interpretation that is unashamedly described as “activist”, including by judges themselves. Thus in India, at least in most legal circles, the phrase “judicial activism” is not viewed as one of condemnation. So urgent and numerous are the needs of that society that anything else would be regarded by many— including many judges and lawyers—as an abdication of the final court’s essential constitutional role…”

Combating fake news by using the principle of herd immunity

The menace of fake news is now a widely accepted phenomenon. The internet, which is a vehicle of progress and holds promise of opportunities to billions of users, is now interspersed with fake news and sub-standard articles. This seemingly true looking, highly non-discernible fake news is a challenge to the sanctity of the internet and is one of the greatest threat to this vehicle of progress. Interestingly technologies which were tools for designers like Photoshop, video editing tools and not to mention Artificial Intelligence which apart from being used to make wonderful tools for mankind are being used to produce more and more realistic looking fake news day by day. Not only that algorithms of websites like the Facebook is being exploited to ensure fake news articles are well targeted and get the widest attention. The consequences are varied with different levels of intensity. At the individual level, it is leading to depressions, false reasoning, and radicalization. At higher levels consequences are taking an intense turn like mob lynching, riots and recently at the national level it resulted in false propaganda and radical election results. Eminent personalities, world leaders, state, civil societies, individuals- everyone has acknowledged the presence of fake news and the damage it is inflicting on people lives. Now the question is how can we combat this issue?

A lecture in my recent science class hit me with this idea which can be a probable solution to this issue. My science teacher was trying to explain how a high resistance is offered to the spread of a contagious disease within a population, if a sufficiently high proportion of individuals are immune to the disease, especially through vaccination. He referred to the principle as herd immunity. The idea is simple. If suppose a community consists of three individuals A, B and C, among whom A and B are vaccinated against polio, the chances of C getting polio virus is drastically reduced. This is because A and B who are vaccinated act as death chamber to polio virus circulating in the community and thereby decreasing the chances of C getting infected by the virus. Now suppose instead of polio virus we as a community have to combat fake news. What required is we as a member of the community acting as death chamber to the fake news article. For this, we have to vet every news article that seems suspicious and report it so that such articles are removed. Rather than casually sharing every pleasing article that comes across us, we must ensure we have done some background check so that we are certain about the credibility of whatever we share online. When we perform such checks, it ensures such article is prevented from spreading and an individual or a society as a whole is saved from the consequences.  Seems like a lot of work given the variety and intensity of spreading fake news articles. But let’s face it- the internet as we use today became a resource by the contribution of not few people but millions of people. And we as a responsible user of the internet should ensure this repository is not spoiled and it does not end up being used as a tool against humanity and principles we stand for. Let us work together to redeem what we believe is the original purpose of the internet.

Celebrating Earth Hour every day

So it’s been 2 weeks since I had synced my daily schedule with Sunrise and Sunset. My main aim was to ensure I utilize daylight to the maximum extent. I’m a student, hence by utilization I mean devoting daylight to study and keeping things like meeting friends, talking on the phone etc. etc. to be done after the sunset. This resolution of mine to sync my schedule with Sunlight has the origin in a set of thoughts major and minor. These thoughts are discussed in the following paragraphs.

To start with, waking up in the early morning is a cherished experience on its own. The sun just coming up, spreading its light, sound of birds, cool breeze –there is a strange and fantastic sense of charm in the atmosphere in these early hours. The benefits of waking up early have not been denied by any literature or people since ages.

But for me, the prime push was my growing awareness about global warming, climate change and how decreasing energy use can mitigate such a crisis. This thought came to my mind when I understood reasons behind the adoption of daylight savings by countries away from the equator. Last year, Argentina changed its standard time so as to ensure daylight is not wasted. Such conscious effort by an entire nation inspired me to take initiative towards saving daylight hours and using it in the most efficient way as a daily exercise.

The latest push was on March 25th. On 25th March 2017, Earth Hour was celebrated. An article in Business Standard stated that around 237 MW of energy was saved in Delhi alone. Given the timing i.e. 8:30 pm to 9:30 pm and urban nature of Delhi, such massive reduction on electricity is obvious. That got me thinking – how about we celebrate Earth Day every day? And I came to know that yes it is possible and very simple to do so. Night time is when apart from other activities, lighting contributes to high energy demand and utilization. So I synced my schedule with daylight hours, I went to sleep early. This resulted in switching off the lights in my room 4 hours prior to what I used to do earlier. Isn’t that what Earth Day is about- saving energy by switching off lights?

A bit of internet research suggested that for 1MW electricity, 4000 tons of coal is burned per annum. Such huge amount of burning of coal drastically impair the atmospheric gaseous composition and result in a range of adverse climate and environment damage which is referred as Climate Change. If 1 hour of Earth Hour resulted in savings of 237 MW in Delhi region only, just imagine the amount of savings we, collectively will achieve if we go to bed a little early. I’m telling you the amount of energy saved will be enormous and subsequent coal burned will be reduced by millions of tons.

So my dear friends, let us pledge that we will save energy by utilizing daylight to the maximum extent. You will agree that such an effort will be a great contribution towards saving Mother Nature who gives us everything, without asking anything in return. Let’s decide Earth Hour is not an annual event and reducing carbon footprint is a daily habit.

So Happy Earth Hour day!!!!


A post result analysis of the UK referendum : what the numbers didn’t accounted for

I am writing this post 3 hours after the result of UK referendum is out and UK voted to leave EU. The result was a shock for people and market all over the world. It was a shock for who voted to “remain” in the EU, even the “leave” campaigners were surprised as till Thursday and early hours of Friday when the counting started the “remain” were leading. So what happened after that?

The early poll numbers clearly favored “remain” campaign. The huge consequences in the economy, trade, and money after “Brexit” were brought to the center of discussion. On the other hand “leave” campaign was buttressed over the figure of fund outflow to EU, immigration and loss in employment. The numbers were very clear and most of the people, to be precise, the onlookers all over the world made their decision based on those numbers. And why not will they have an opinion? It is easy to make a decision when we have separate columns of data.

I am an Indian citizen and I myself was surprised with the results. I like being part of the world politics and happenings and so was following the entire referendum since it’s momentum started after the meeting in Brussels in Feb 2016. I followed several articles to make myself understand whether I would vote for “leave” or “remain” if I were a citizen of the UK. I myself made my decision in support of “remain” based on the numbers in media and I feel this was where I went wrong.img_20160624_151746.jpg

A human being, unlike a robot, does not make decisions based on data only, especially when that human being is attached to a thing in more ways than what some mere stats and figures suggest.Our opinion was moulded by stats and facts given in the media. I do not say that the facts were wrong but I would say “Brexit” occurred due to a lot of other factors that did not take the shape of stats and the citizens of UK did take into account such factors that the number or stats did not
account for. That is why our opinion was not reflected in the UK referendum results this morning. The next question which arises is – what factors were absent in the stats? What factors went unaccounted in the figures? My take on this is – It is the conscience and emotion of the citizens that went uncounted in the stats which actually were the prime mover behind the shift of “Bremain” to “Brexit”. The emotions related with the ideas of sovereignty, liberty, and control which the citizens of UK felt that they had lost it to an unelected, non-responsible European Union which they cannot hold responsible for any situation good or bad, was uncounted and that is the reason “Brexit” happened. The union which started as a multilateral economic tie grew so big that it started affecting every aspect of the life of the people inside it. Human beings are considerate most of the time & they try to adjust with such changes or interferences. The citizens of the UK were hopeful that the elected government of the UK will cut a good deal or the EU will reform itself in the response of the growing skepticism. But one can be considerate only for a good amount of time.

A citizen cannot take government inaction as ok. The negotiation that started since Thatcher government has now ended with a clear mandate of the citizens of the UK. The message is clear: “Every institution which cannot be held accountable for it’s act will be unseated by a new institution which is more responsible than the former”. The market responded with GBP plunge because it fears uncertainty, but it is the citizens who have a larger concern.